
I hear Yankees' fans and the nation's journalists (who overwhelmingly predicted the Phils would lose in 6 again and this time were right) condescending, "Well, they gave it their best, how could they possibly be expected to beat the superior Yankees."
The 2009 World Series will go down as a better than average (6 Game) Series which was inevitably won by the "better" team, the Yankees. That just isn't true, as I will substantiate.
The 2009 Phillies weren't allowed to 'give it their best' due to the choices made, with all due respect, by Charlie Manuel, whose mismanagement of the pitching staff cost the Phils the World Series in 2009:
1) Cole Hamels
2) Brad Lidge
3) Chad Durbin
4) J.A. Happ
5) Clay Condrey
6) Pedro Martinez
1) Hamels was not a good pitcher during 2009. Nonetheless, he was given a start in round 1 of the playoffs by Manuel. No one could fault him for this, as Hamels had been the pitching hero for his World Series winning team the year before. However, once Hamels got clobbered by Colorado for the team's only 1st round loss, Manuel should have backed off him, despite Hamels' overblown ego and marquee reputation. Then, Manuel gave Hamels a 2nd postseason shot against L.A., where Hamels was swiftly pounded into oblivion. Manuel, therefore, can certainly be faulted for giving Hamels the ball yet again in the World Series, allowing him to 'strike out' (go 0-for-3 in this postseason's outings), which cost the Phillies 1 World Series game.
3) Chad Durbin. On 8.7.09, I wrote:
"Am I the only one who has noticed that Chad Durbin hasn't pitched well enough to be in our bullpen? Durbin has walked 33 in 48 innings. More troubling, Durbin hasn't been reliably effective since July of 2008, over a year ago. In Aug. '08, his ERA was 4.32. In September, it was 6.94."
On 8.31.09, I wrote:
"Durbin finished August with a 10.13 ERA, after posting a 6.75 ERA in July. There is no upward trend for him, having allowed 4 ER in his last 2 innings of work."
This was my argument against the Phillies carrying Durbin on their regular season roster. How could they rely on him in an elimination game in the World Series, where, in Game 6, Durbin turned a 1 run deficit into a 4 run closeout game?! It was total insanity, which I forecasted on 10.5.09 re. Manuel's use of his bullpenners:
"...how expertly Manuel deploys them (with the exception of Durbin and Lidge, who he relies upon to a fault)..."
To put Hamels, Lidge and finally Durbin in a position to self destruct in the World Series was insulting to anyone who had watched them pitch in 2009 and ultimately cost the Phils the title.
4) J.A. Happ -- When is the last time a MLB team had that year's Rookie-of-the-Year, a

5) Clay Condrey-- The Phillies most consistent bullpenner during the '09 season was castoff of a team famously starved for relief arms, despite the fact he hadn't allowed an earned run since 6/18! Why were Condrey and Happ rejected, while Durbin and Martinez relied upon to a fault, despite all statistics and logic?! Of course, the argument would be Happ's "inexperience;" however, again, statistics would prove that false. In 2008, Happ shined in the NLCS vs. L.A. and he S.O. 3 of 4 Yankees he faced in Game 6 (his lone Series appearance), when he was brought in as relief for Pedro-- too little, too late.
6) Pedro Martinez-- A lot has been made of Manuel's leaving Pedro in for too long in Game 6 when Martinez was clearly ineffective from his 1st pitch. I am including his name in my argument of mismanaged pitchers, but actually have less conviction about him than I do about the previously mentioned 5, whose sum total of mishandling led directly to the Yankees' 27th World Series title.

No comments:
Post a Comment